Neuroscience-Informed Coaching Practice

Sarah M. McKay &

Sarah Smith 

Chapter

First Online: 30 September 2021

1814 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Abstract

Neuroscience provides coaches with a compelling lens through which to view their coachee’s thoughts, feelings and behaviours. However, enthusiasm for integrating neuroscience into coaching often outpaces the coach’s knowledge of the subject matter. In addition, there is no empirical evidence for the use of neuroscience within positive psychology coaching (PPC) per se. To address these concerns, this chapter considers the lessons learned from two disciplines which have scrutinised the opportunities and limitations of translating neuroscience into practice: educational neuroscience (EN) in the classroom setting and psychoeducation (PE) in the mental health setting. Opportunities exist for the thoughtful development of neuroscience-informed coaching practice including (i) the development of neuroscience-informed content for coaching conversations (the ‘what’), (ii) the development of neuroscience-informed structures or tools for the delivery of coaching (the ‘how’), and (iii) validation of coaching efficacy using neuroscience technology (e.g. testing how coaching ‘works’). Attention needs to turn towards the training of coaches in how to assess, understand and integrate neuroscientific research to ensure the continuation of evidence-based coaching practice.

References

  • Allen, S. (2019). Positive neuroscience. A white paper prepared for the John Templeton Foundation by the Greater Good Science Center at UC Berkeley. February. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31464486.

  • Anderson, M., & Della Sala, M. (2012). Neuroscience in education: An (opinionated) introduction. In S. Della Sala & M. Anderson (Eds.), Neuroscience in Education. The good, the bad and the ugly (pp. 3–12). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardern, J. B. (2015). Brain2Brain: Enacting client change through the persuasive power of neuroscience. Wiley.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. P., Madigan, D. J., Cope, E., & Nicholls, A. R. (2018). The prevalence of pseudoscientific ideas and neuromyths among sports coaches. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(May), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00641.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2020). 7 1/2 lessons about the brain. Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, A., & Hock, M. (2019, April). The brain science behind business. Harvard Business Review Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossons, P., Riddell, P., & Sartain, D. (2015). The neuroscience of leadership coaching: Why the tools and techniques of leadership coaching work. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J. S. (2016). The practical and principled problems with educational neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123(5), 600–612.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E., & Jack, A. I. (2018). The neuroscience of coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal, 70(1), 11–27.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Brann, A. (2017). Neuroscience for coaches how to use the latest insights for the benefit of your clients (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, C., & Michael, M. (2014). Enacting the ‘neuro’ in practice: Translational research, adhesion and the promise of porosity. Social Studies of Science, 44(5), 680–700.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Bruer, J. T. (2016). Where is educational neuroscience? Educational Neuroscience, 1, 237761611561803. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377616115618036.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Busa, J., Harrison, J., Chappell, J., Yoshinaga-Itano, C., Grimes, A., Brookhouser, P. E., Epstein, S., Mehl, A., Vohr, B., Gravel, J., Roush, J., Widen, J., Benedict, B. S., Scoggins, B., King, M., Pippins, L., Savage, D. H., Ackermann, J., Gibson, A., … Mason, P. (2007). Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 120(4), 898–921.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth, S. (2010). Health-coaching strategies to improve patient-centered outcomes. JAOA• Supplement 5 (The Whole Patient), 110(4), 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesario, J., Johnson, D. J., & Eisthen, H. L. (2020). Your brain is not an onion with a tiny reptile inside. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 255–260.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Im, S.-h., Cho, J. Y., Dubinsky, J. M., & Varma, S. (2018). Taking an educational psychology course improves neuroscience literacy but does not reduce belief in neuromyths. PLoS One, 13(2), 1–19.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S., Lee, N. C., Howard-Jones, P., & Jolles, J. (2012). Neuromyths in education: Prevalence and predictors of misconceptions among teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(Oct), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas, D. L., & Luke, C. (2019). Neuroscience for counselors: Recommendations for developing and teaching a graduate course. The Professional Counselor, 9(4), 369–380.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2015). Carol dweck revisits the ‘growth mindset.’ Education weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekhtiari, H., Rezapour, T., Aupperle, R. L., Paulus, M. P., States, U., Program, N., & States, U. (2018). Neuroscience-informed psychoeducation for addiction medicine: A neurocognitive perspective Hamed. Progress Brain Research, 239–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, G., Carson, A. J., & Welch, K. A. (2016). Cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: Systematic review of imaging studies. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 28(2), 61–74.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 459–480.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. (2015). Coaching the brain: Neuro-science or neuro-nonsense? The Coaching Psychologist, 11(1), 31–37.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. (2016). What constitutes evidence-based coaching? A two-by-two framework for distinguishing strong from weak evidence for coaching. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching & Mentoring, 14(1), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., & O’Connor, S. (2019). A brief primer for those new to coaching research and evidence-based practice. The Coaching Psychologist, 15(June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & Palmer, S. (2019). Positive psychology coaching. Science into practice. In S. Green & S. Palmer (Eds.), Postive psychology coaching in practice. (pp. 1–20). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grospietsch, F., & Mayer, J. (2019). Pre-service science teachers’ neuroscience literacy: Neuromyths and a professional understanding of learning and memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13(February).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S., & Furnham, A. (2016). Coaching as a developmental intervention in organisations: A systematic review of its effectiveness and the mechanisms underlying it. PLoS One, 11(7), 1–41.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Gucciardi, E., Jean-Pierre, N., Karam, G., & Sidani, S. (2016). Designing and delivering facilitated storytelling interventions for chronic disease self-management: A scoping review. BMC Health Services Research, 16(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, D. Y., & Chen, S. H. (2014). Reducing the stigma of depression through neurobiology-based psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 68(9), 666–673.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Hickok, G. (2009). Eight problems for the Mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(7), 1229–1243.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J. C., & Donoghue, G. M. (2016). A bridge too far–revisited: Reframing Bruer’s Neuroeducation argument for modern science of learning practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(Mar), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. K., Bennett, C., & Rochani, H. (2020). Significant improvement of somatic symptom disorder with brief psychoeducational intervention by PMHNP in primary care. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P., Lockley, S. W., Kelley, J., & Evans, M. D. R. (2017). Is 8:30 a.m. still too early to start school? A 10:00 a.m. school start time improves health and performance of students aged 13–16. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(Dec).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, P., & Whatson, T. (2013). Making long-term memories in minutes: A spaced learning pattern from memory research in education. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7(Sep), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, A., Woodward, A., Jackson, S., Wang, Y., & Crawford, M. A. (2010). A double-blind, placebo-controlled study investigating the effects of omega-3 supplementation in children aged 8-10 years from a mainstream school population. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(3), 718–730.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Laske, O. E. (2006). From coach training to coach education: Teaching coaching within a comprehensively evidence based framework. Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 4(1), 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard, F., Vigerland, S., Andersson, E., Rück, C., Mataix-Cols, D., Thulin, U., Ljótsson, B., & Serlachius, E. (2014). Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: An open trial. PLoS One, 9(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Bates, T. C. (2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 148(9), 1640–1655.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukens, E. P., & McFarlane, W. R. (2004). Psychoeducation as evidence-based practice: Considerations for practice, research, and policy. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4(3), 205–225.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, K., Germine, L., Anderson, A., Christodoulou, J., & McGrath, L. M. (2017). Dispelling the myth: Training in education or neuroscience decreases but does not eliminate beliefs in neuromyths. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(Aug), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay, I. (2020). The swiss cheese respiratory virus pandemic defence. Twitter. https://twitter.com/MackayIM/status/1319901144836026368

  • Martinez-Conde, S., Alexander, R. G., Blum, D., Britton, N., Lipska, B. K., Quirk, G. J., Swiss, J. I., Willems, R. M., & Macknik, S. L. (2019). The storytelling brain: How neuroscience stories help bridge the gap between research and society. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 39(42), 8285–8290.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D., & Castel, A. (2008). Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition, 107, 343–352.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. M., & Kemp, T. (2019). Neuroscience and coaching. A practical application. In S. Green & S. Palmer (Eds.), Positive Psychology Coaching in Practice. (pp. 57–70). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meppelink, C. S., Van Weert, J. C. M., Haven, C. J., & Smit, E. G. (2015). The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: An experimental study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e11.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Meynen, G. (2016). Neurolaw: Recognizing opportunities and challenges for psychiatry. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 41(1), 3–5.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. (2016). Neuroeducation: Integrating brain-based psychoeducation into clinical practice. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 38(2), 103–115.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Mobbs, D., Adolphs, R., Fanselow, M. S., Barrett, L. F., Ledoux, J. E., & Tye, K. M. (2019). Embracing our fear. Scientific American Mind, 36(6), 24–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M., & Jackson, E. (2018). Health and wellness coaching. In E. Cox, T. Bachkirova, & D. Clutterbuck (Eds.), The complete handbook of coaching (pp. 345–362).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brion, A. (2015). Coaching psychology and neuroscience: Cross-disciplinary opportunities and challenges. The Coaching Psychologist, 11(1), 30–31.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, C., Rees, G., & Joffe, H. (2012). Neuroscience in the public sphere. Neuron, 74(2), 220–226.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Understanding the brain: The birth of a learning science. New insights on learning through cognitive and brain science. OECD/CERI International Conference “Learning in the 21st Century: Research, Innovation and Policy,” 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira Dias, G., Palmer, S., O’Riordan, S., de Freitas, S., Habib, L., Bevilaqua, M., & Nardi, A. (2015). Perspectives and challenges for the study of brain responses to coaching: Enhancing the dialogue between the fields of neuroscience and coaching psychology. The Coaching Psychologist, 11(1), 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purves, D., Augustine, G. J., Fitzpatrick, D., Hall, W. C., LaMantia, A.-S., Mooney, R. D., Platt, M. L., & White, L. E. (2018). Neuroscience (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (2000). Human error: Models and management. British Medical Journal, 320(7237), 768–770.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Rock, D., & Page, L. (2009). Coaching with the brain in mind: Foundations for practice. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuepbach, W. M. M., Rau, J., Knudsen, K., Volkmann, J., Krack, P., Timmermann, L., Hälbig, T. D., Hesekamp, H., Navarro, S. M., Meier, N., Falk, D., Mehdorn, M., Paschen, S., Maarouf, M., Barbe, M. T., Fink, G. R., Kupsch, A., Gruber, D., Schneider, G.-H., … EARLYSTIM Study Group. (2013). Neurostimulation for Parkinson’s disease with early motor complications. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368(7), 610–622.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Scurich, N., & Shniderman, A. (2014). The selective allure of neuroscientific explanations. PLoS One, 9(9), 1–6.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • SFN. (2018). A companion publication to BrainFacts. org and a primer on the brain and nervous system. In Society for Neuroscience (Vol. 8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Swart, T., Chisholm, K., & Brown, P. (2015). Neuroscience for leadership. Harnessing the brain gain advantage: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. S. C., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C. P. (2019). Annual research review: Educational neuroscience: Progress and prospects. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 60(4), 477–492.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, D. S., Keil, F. C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470–477.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, B. D. (2018). The limits of neuroscience in counseling: A humanistic perspective and proposed model. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 57(1), 70–78.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Xia, J., Merinder, L. B., & Belgamwar, M. R. (2011). Psychoeducation for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 37(1), 21–22.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Brann, A. (2017). Neuroscience for coaches how to use the latest insights for the benefit of your clients (2nd ed.). Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. (2015). Coaching the brain: Neuro-science or neuro-nonsense? The Coaching Psychologist, 11(1), 31–37.

    CrossRef Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A., & O’Connor, S. (2019). A brief primer for those new to coaching research and evidence-based practice. The Coaching Psychologist, 15(June).

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. M., & Kemp, T. (2019). Neuroscience and coaching. A practical application. In S. Green & S. Palmer (Eds.), Positive psychology coaching in practice. (pp. 57–70). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Think Brain Pty Ltd, Allambie Heights, NSW, Australia

    Sarah M. McKay

  2. University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK

    Sarah Smith

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Eclorev, Paris, France

    Wendy-Ann Smith

  2. École de Psychologues Praticiens, Paris, France

    Wendy-Ann Smith

  3. University of East London, London, UK

    Wendy-Ann Smith, Ilona Boniwell & Suzy Green,  & 

  4. Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK

    Wendy-Ann Smith & Ilona Boniwell & 

  5. Positran Ltd, Epone, France

    Ilona Boniwell

  6. The Positivity Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Suzy Green

Previous
Previous

Coaching and Neuroscience by Ann Betz

Next
Next

7 principles of brain-based psychotherapy that all coaches should become familiar with.